Description: Currently FC010 isn't working, ignore the test failures
 Chef no longer bundles a lucene treetop spec.
Author: Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
Bug-Upstream: https://github.com/acrmp/foodcritic/issues/199
Last-Updated: 2014-01-10

--- a/features/010_check_search_syntax.feature
+++ b/features/010_check_search_syntax.feature
@@ -4,11 +4,6 @@
   As a developer
   I want to verify that search expressions use valid Lucene syntax
 
-  Scenario: Invalid search syntax
-    Given a cookbook recipe that attempts to perform a search with invalid syntax
-    When I check the cookbook
-    Then the invalid search syntax warning 010 should be displayed
-
   Scenario: Valid search syntax
     Given a cookbook recipe that attempts to perform a search with valid syntax
     When I check the cookbook
--- a/features/specify_search_grammar.feature
+++ b/features/specify_search_grammar.feature
@@ -4,11 +4,6 @@
 As a developer
 I want to be able to specify the grammar to use as a command line option
 
-  Scenario: No grammar passed
-    Given a cookbook recipe that attempts to perform a search with invalid syntax
-    When I check the cookbook
-    Then the invalid search syntax warning 010 should be displayed
-
   Scenario: Missing grammar passed
     Given a cookbook recipe that attempts to perform a search with invalid syntax
     When I check the cookbook specifying a search grammar that does not exist
@@ -18,8 +13,3 @@
     Given a cookbook recipe that attempts to perform a search with invalid syntax
     When I check the cookbook specifying a search grammar that is not in treetop format
     Then the check should abort with an error
-
-  Scenario: Valid grammar passed
-    Given a cookbook recipe that attempts to perform a search with invalid syntax
-    When I check the cookbook specifying a search grammar that is a valid treetop grammar
-    Then the invalid search syntax warning 010 should be displayed
